2009 Midyear Report: Index Funds vs. Managed Funds
by Doug on Aug.23, 2009, under Fixed Income
No surprise. Bond index funds win again. Equity index funds win in most categories.
Standard & Poors released its semiannual study on index funds vs. managed funds (SPIVA). It covers 1, 3, and 5 years.
The study found that on an asset-weighted basis — measuring returns by the invested dollar rather than percentage of funds — index returns beat actively-managed fund returns in all 13 fixed-income categories over one and three years, and in 11 of 13 categories over five years.
One surprise was mortgage-backed securities. The index won around 98% of the time for 1, 3, and 5 year periods.
Index funds generally have much lower costs than managed funds, often 1% or more.
For index bond funds, there is usually less than 0.1% difference in cost between the index bond fund and the index it tracks.
What does this mean for me?
For mortgage-backed securities, the answer is easy: the index fund won 98% of the time.
Since bond index funds have low expenses, they have a much better advantage than managed bond funds, especially long term.
Managed REIT funds have an advantage over corresponding index funds.
For the most part, equity index funds beat managed funds.
